The PROMIS Blog
Benefiting from an Enterprise Architecture
2009-05-06 14:02 by Mirko Kiefer (2 comments)
In the
current economic situation many companies and organizations may ask - why
should we use our low budgets to invest in something such abstract as an
enterprise architecture?
In fact, it
is usually really a difficult topic to fully use the benefits an efficient
architecture provides for an organization. Many EA projects fail due to the
lack of common understanding of all stakeholders on what the actual strategic
objectives are.
Enterprise
Architecture is a complex term -even experts in the field still dispute about
what it exactly means.
But instead
of trying to give just another definition of the term I will give you an
example how an IT department can benefit from a good enterprise architecture.
IT is an
important part of an enterprise architecture as it is usually one the most
complex organizational parts in a large company.
A typical problem in any larger organization is the lack of a harmonized and
coordinated software development and IT structure. Each department develops its
own IT solutions for an existing problem even if a similar problem occurred in
other departments before.
By analyzing the processes that lead e.g. to the development or buying of a new
software and comparing them to similar ones in other departments, mismanagement
can be uncovered. So it might be more efficient to implement an architecture
that unifies all decision procedures leading to the development or buying of a
new tool.
In this way the portability of applications could be increased and software
development, support and maintenance costs will be significantly lower.
A more sustainable architecture like this will also reduce the future cost of
upgrading existing components or even exchanging them.
Having a unified IT architecture also makes a company more flexible on deciding
if to buy, out-source IT solutions or even develop their own ones. In this way
the risks of future investments are reduced.

Add a comment
Comment by Michael | 2009-05-06
Comment by Mirko | 2009-05-06